Search NALS Online powered by FreeFind




December 2005

Beware of the Jury Duty Scam
by Caryn F. Kelly, PLS


Just when we thought we’d heard everything about identity theft scams, another twist in the scam game has surfaced and is quickly becoming widespread. Beware of the “Jury Duty Scam,” the latest in a series of identity theft scams targeting unsuspecting victims over the telephone. So far, this scam has been reported in Michigan, Ohio, Texas, Arizona, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Minnesota, Maryland, Oregon, and Washington state. As of this writing, it could have penetrated other states as well. Those who are educated enough in the intricacies of identity theft know the steps to take to protect their identity, but now the unwary and na_ve are being tricked into giving their personal information over the telephone to thieves who call themselves “court personnel.” This scheme may be categorized as a “social engineering” scam, a technique which preys on people’s unquestioning acceptance of authority and willingness to cooperate. While this particular attempt to coerce information for potential victims is not new, it is very real.

The scam is simple, yet extremely dangerous, and caution must be taken if you or anyone you know falls victim. These thieves call their victims at their homes or offices claiming that they failed to report for jury duty, and that a warrant has been issued for their arrest. Upon hearing this horrible news, the victim is placed at an immediate disadvantage, and is most likely to be shocked, surprised, or caught off guard. The victim probably would claim that he never received such a notice to appear for jury duty or that it must have been mailed to a wrong address. The scam artist may then reassure the victim that this is all just a misunderstanding or that it is some sort of clerical error, and that he only needs to “verify” the victim’s personal information. The victim will then be asked for his social security number, birth date, bank account numbers, and sometimes even credit card numbers—exactly what the scam artist needs to steal the victim’s identity. If the victim is reluctant to reveal such information, the scam artist may threaten the victim, telling him that if he doesn’t provide the information, the arrest warrant will be executed immediately. Some of these calls can be quite frightening and persuasive. Because of the seriousness of the charge against him, the victim will undoubtedly become upset and nervous and proceed to rattle off his personal information, trusting that the person on the other end of the line is who he says he is. Instead of thinking about the possibility of getting his identity stolen, the victim is more concerned about being arrested for not showing up for jury duty. When the call is finished, most victims are left with the impression that they failed to show up for jury duty and are still obligated to fulfill their civic duties, or that a big misunderstanding has been resolved. In either event, what these unsuspecting victims don’t realize is that their identity has just been stolen, and their problems are only just beginning.

Much is being done to alert the public about this assault on personal identity. On August 22, 2005, the Minnesota Judicial Branch issued a warning about these bogus calls, and similar warnings started showing up in e-mail boxes. In New Mexico, Representative Tom Udall has been warning citizens about this scam, pointing out that federal courts do not require anyone to provide sensitive information over the phone and that they should never, ever do so. The Superior Court of California has posted an alert on its Web site, warning that identity thieves posing as court officials have been making these calls to illicit personal information, and that it is simply not true.

Although this scam has been gathering attention since 2005, it is not new. In September 2004, at least five citizens of Franklin County, Ohio, had called the Franklin County Municipal Court inquiring about where to report for jury duty, saying that they received a call from someone from the court asking for their personal information and saying that they should have received a notice to appear. In February 2004, residents of Charles County, Maryland, were called by thieves who claimed to be assembling a pool of jurors for selection in upcoming trials. In fact, the Charles County Circuit Court does not telephone residents who are selected for jury duty, but rather potential jurors are sent notices in the mail.

How do you avoid becoming a victim to jury duty scams?

1. Always remember that legitimate court personnel will not call you to tell you that you’ve missed jury duty or that they are assembling jury pools. Dismiss all calls like this as fraudulent. The only time you may hear from court personnel regarding jury duty is after you have mailed back your completed questionnaire, and even then only rarely.

2. Do not give out bank account, social security, or credit card numbers over the telephone if you didn’t initiate the call, whether it be someone trying to sell you something or someone who claims to be a government or bank official. If the caller insists upon verifying your information, have him read your information to you so that you can verify it, rather than the other way around.

3. Examine your credit card and bank accounts every month, keeping a close eye on anything that was not authorized by you.

4. If you receive one of these calls, get the caller’s name and phone number, if you can. Then report the call to your local circuit court jury coordinator immediately. The court will report the incident to law enforcement.
For regularly updated articles about protection from identity theft, go to http://spyware-information.com/articles_1.html.

 

maximizing your potential!
NALS...the association for legal professionals

© NALS, Inc. all rights reserved
NALS is dedicated to enhancing the competencies and contributions of members in the legal services profession
NALS Resource Center | 314 East Third Street, Suite 210 74120 | 918.582.5188 | 918.582.5907 (fax)