| Online Store
Community Search
Print Page   |   Contact Us   |   Sign In   |   Join NALS
Community Search
the NALS docket
Blog Home All Blogs
Search all posts for:   


View all (110) posts »

For Want Of A Comma–The Oxford Comma Update

Posted By Kathy Sieckman, PP, PLS-SC, ACP, Thursday, March 22, 2018
Updated: Monday, March 26, 2018

Nearly a year ago, I wrote an article about a case, the crux of which was the lack of an Oxford comma. Here is the section of that article quoting the language missing the Oxford comma:

Here is the law’s wording about activities NOT meriting overtime pay:

The canning, processing, preserving, freezing, drying, marketing, storing, packing for shipment or distribution of:
(1) Agricultural produce;
(2) Meat and fish products; and
(3) Perishable foods.


Based on this language, is packing for shipment its own activity or is it packing for the distribution of the three things on the list? If an Oxford comma had separated “packing for shipment” and “or,” the meaning would have been much more clear. According to court documents, the drivers arguing for overtime actually distribute perishable food, but they do not pack it. That argument helped win the case.

The Oakhurst Dairy drivers who brought the case had asked for $10 million. Court documents filed last week indicate the case was settled for $5 million. All for the want of a comma . . .


This post has not been tagged.

Share |
Permalink | Comments (1)

Comments on this post...

Jacquelyn Hannigan (Firth) PP PLS says...
Posted Thursday, March 29, 2018
A nice sum for a missing comma.
Permalink to this Comment }

more Calendar

3/21/2018 » 3/21/2019
NALS 2018 Online Leadership Course + Discussion

Amylyn Riedling PP PLS-SC2018 NALS Board of Directors
Nakia A. Bradley-Lawson2018 NALS Board of Directors

Association Management Software Powered by YourMembership  ::  Legal